Performance Record: [PROJECT ID]

Per-piece metrics template: Tier 1/2/3, EQS tracking, 90-day summary.

Performance Record: [PROJECT ID]

[Working Title] Published: [DATE] | Primary venue: [Venue] Last Updated: [DATE]

This record accumulates performance data for a single published piece across its full lifecycle. Update at 30, 60, and 90 days post-publication. Feed signals to the Quarterly Review.


Publication Log

Artifact URL Published Platform
Primary article [URL] [DATE] [Blog / LinkedIn / Trade pub]
LinkedIn post 1 [URL] [DATE] LinkedIn
LinkedIn post 2 [URL] [DATE] LinkedIn
LinkedIn post 3 [URL] [DATE] LinkedIn
Newsletter mention [Issue #N] [DATE] Newsletter

Tier 1 — Reach

Lagging indicators. Context only — do not optimize for these. High reach + low engagement = distribution without resonance.

Metric 30d 60d 90d Notes
LinkedIn post 1 impressions
LinkedIn post 2 impressions
LinkedIn post 3 impressions
Blog page views
Newsletter open rate (issue)
Article shares (LinkedIn)

Tier 2 — Engagement

Leading indicators. These predict future Tier 3 outcomes. Diagnose performance here.

LinkedIn Engagement Quality Score (EQS)

SSOT: EQS formula and metric weights are canonical in PERFORMANCE_TRACKER.md. Reproduced below for reference — if weights change, update that file only.

EQS = (saves × 5) + (long_comments × 2.5) + (short_comments × 1) + (reactions × 1)

Metric weights source: LinkedIn algorithm research (GOV-007, 2025-2026) — see PERFORMANCE_TRACKER.md for full weight table and rationale.

Metric Post 1 Post 2 Post 3 Notes
Saves
Comments ≥15 words
Comments <15 words
Reactions
Reposts with commentary
EQS Calculate above

Blog Engagement

Metric 30d 60d 90d
Time on page (avg)
Bounce rate

Notable Comments

Record any substantive LinkedIn or blog comments that signal audience intelligence — what they're saying, what vocabulary they use, what questions they're asking.

Date Platform Name/Handle Comment Summary Audience Signal

Tier 3 — Business Impact

Ultimate indicators. These lag Tier 2 by weeks to months. Do not expect Tier 3 in the first quarter.

Signal Date Contact Context Outcome
Inquiry mentioning this piece
Speaking invitation referencing this piece
Referral citing this piece
Proposal where this piece was used

Audience Intelligence

Who actually engaged with this piece? Does it match the target audience?

Target audience for this piece: [From WSD — who was this written for?] Who actually engaged (observed): [Based on LinkedIn profiles of commenters and reactors] Unexpected audience: [Anyone outside the target who engaged substantially?] Audience signal for Persona update: [Anything that should update the relevant Audience Persona?]


Feedback Signals

Signals to feed back into the system:

Content Improvement Signal

What would make this piece more effective? - [ ] Opening hook weak — replace with [alternative] - [ ] Missing argument: [what the comments suggest was missing] - [ ] Wrong framing for target audience — [diagnosis] - [ ] Right argument, wrong channel — [where it should have been]

Topic Follow-Up Signal

What questions did this piece generate that warrant a follow-up piece? - [Question/angle not addressed] - [New topic identified from comment threads]

Pattern Signal

If this piece used a specific pattern (PATTERN-PRACTITIONER-ARTICLE-v1 etc.): Pattern used: [Pattern ID] Pattern fitness: [What worked / what didn't / what felt forced] → Feed this to Pattern Retrospectives at quarterly review


90-Day Summary

Complete at 90-day mark. This is the record that feeds the Quarterly Review.

Overall assessment: [HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW] engagement relative to investment Best-performing element: [Which post / which section of the article] Primary audience: [Who actually engaged] Tier 3 signals: [None yet / [Count] signals] Recommendation for quarterly review: [Invest more in this territory / Adjust framing / Discontinue topic cluster / Wait for more data]


Distribution Brief Reference

/projects/[PROJECT-ID]/DISTRIBUTION_BRIEF.md